Let's just get this out of the way right now: Stavro is lazy. He doesn't like to think, and although he is extremely food motivated, he's far more nap motivated and just gives up when the training goes beyond anything he already knows.
Now make no mistake, he's a great dog and has excellent house and leash manners. He knows the things he needs to know to be a welcome member of the family and we never worry about him getting into trouble. But he still isn't reliable about distinguishing the difference between sit and down after 3 years of work. Our training sessions are very short and mostly consist of "puppy push-ups", or asking him to sit, then lie down, then sit again just to remind him of the difference. His vocabulary is limited to "around the house" behaviors such as off, get back, in, out, go potty, etc. and he knows to wait at doors until released; all of which he picked up during daily life rather than through training.
He has always become very stressed when asked to think, and doesn't really seem to enjoy purposeful training sessions outside of the possibility of food. Our training sessions are filled with stress indicators, even though I try to make them fun and easy. The things that Stavro enjoys are not easy to make into training rewards, and when I do try to incorporate things that he wants he seems to stop caring about them. He is not as closely bonded with us as we're used to dogs being and is independent by nature, but I'm sure part of the distance is the lack of training.
Please understand, I have exclusively owned herding dogs besides Stavro, so my perspective is probably skewed. My other dog, Banksy, a rottweiler/border collie mix is extremely intelligent, motivated and eager to please, and she has an extensive catalog of tricks and commands. Although I haven't had the time to start yet, I intend to work with Banksy in agility and possibly rally, and I often walk her without Stavro because she needs a great deal of exercise and Stavro is dragging after a few blocks. I know it's not fair to compare the two dogs, but I do feel guilty that I do less with Stavro, even though he seems to prefer that.
So here's the question: Should I try to find ways to motivate Stavro to learn/do more together, or should I just let him be him? It's embarrassing to me to show off Banksy's tricks and then explain that Stavro still doesn't reliably sit. I also tend to equate interaction/training with happiness, but that I'm not sure that's the case for Stavro. I feel like I'm neglecting him when I leave him home and go for a run with Banksy. But if Stavro is well-mannered and happy with the level of activity/training he receives (and is stressed by more), do I need to feel guilty? Do you have any tips you can share on motivating an unmotivated dog?
Now make no mistake, he's a great dog and has excellent house and leash manners. He knows the things he needs to know to be a welcome member of the family and we never worry about him getting into trouble. But he still isn't reliable about distinguishing the difference between sit and down after 3 years of work. Our training sessions are very short and mostly consist of "puppy push-ups", or asking him to sit, then lie down, then sit again just to remind him of the difference. His vocabulary is limited to "around the house" behaviors such as off, get back, in, out, go potty, etc. and he knows to wait at doors until released; all of which he picked up during daily life rather than through training.
He has always become very stressed when asked to think, and doesn't really seem to enjoy purposeful training sessions outside of the possibility of food. Our training sessions are filled with stress indicators, even though I try to make them fun and easy. The things that Stavro enjoys are not easy to make into training rewards, and when I do try to incorporate things that he wants he seems to stop caring about them. He is not as closely bonded with us as we're used to dogs being and is independent by nature, but I'm sure part of the distance is the lack of training.
Please understand, I have exclusively owned herding dogs besides Stavro, so my perspective is probably skewed. My other dog, Banksy, a rottweiler/border collie mix is extremely intelligent, motivated and eager to please, and she has an extensive catalog of tricks and commands. Although I haven't had the time to start yet, I intend to work with Banksy in agility and possibly rally, and I often walk her without Stavro because she needs a great deal of exercise and Stavro is dragging after a few blocks. I know it's not fair to compare the two dogs, but I do feel guilty that I do less with Stavro, even though he seems to prefer that.
So here's the question: Should I try to find ways to motivate Stavro to learn/do more together, or should I just let him be him? It's embarrassing to me to show off Banksy's tricks and then explain that Stavro still doesn't reliably sit. I also tend to equate interaction/training with happiness, but that I'm not sure that's the case for Stavro. I feel like I'm neglecting him when I leave him home and go for a run with Banksy. But if Stavro is well-mannered and happy with the level of activity/training he receives (and is stressed by more), do I need to feel guilty? Do you have any tips you can share on motivating an unmotivated dog?
Comment